America today stands at a crossroad. Do we meet the needs of political correctness and put our future into the hand of a race that has proven worldwide its failure to lead a successful country or do we put it into the hands of an over the hill liberal claiming to be a republican.
Truly the election of 2008 will be a date recorded in history. Not as a bowing to the desires of political correctness but rather to the death of the greatest country on earth, the United States of America which can now be called the United States of Political Correctness.
Think back to the words of one of Americas greatest:
"What I would most desire would be the separation of the white and black races."— Spoken at Springfield, Illinois on July 17th, 1858; from ABRAHAM LINCOLN: COMPLETE WORKS, 1894, Vol. 1, page 273
And consider the Rev. Wright, Barack Obama spiritual leader.
We have a large statue of Lincoln and yet we do not heed his words:
"I will say, then, that I AM NOT NOR HAVE EVER BEEN in favor of bringing about in any way the social and political equality of the black and white races---that I am not, nor ever have been, in favor of making voters or jurors of negroes, nor of qualifying them to hold office, nor to intermarry with White people; and I will say in addition to this that there is a physical difference between the White and black races which will ever FORBID the two races living together on terms of social and political equality. And inasmuch as they cannot so live, while they do remain together, there must be the position of superior and inferior, and I, as much as any other man, am in favor of having the superior position assigned to the White race." — 4th Lincoln-Douglas debate, September 18th, 1858; COLLECTED WORKS Vol. 3, pp. 145-146
Why, why has the way of PC overwritten every common sense decision made in our history? Is the future of American to be based on the failed ideas of a political party gone MAD? In a few
months you will be the decider. Does America move to war or prosperity, the decision is yours.
Sunday, June 8, 2008
Tuesday, January 15, 2008
On Dissolving the United States of America
by Michael S. Rozeff
The United States of America is a political union of fifty states and a federal district, commonly considered to be operating under the authority of the U.S. Constitution that was first adopted in 1787. The Union known as the U.S.A. was a creation of the then-existing thirteen states of the Union.
Lysander Spooner has provided ironclad arguments that this Constitution is an invalid authority for Americans of today. If that is so, and I believe it is, then no "legal" moves need to be taken to dissolve the U.S.A. It is already an entity that has no legal authority. In this case, the Union does not legally exist.
To demonstrate that fact and make it operative, however, requires that the Union be effectively shattered; and that requires the successful secession of any person or any political entity within the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. This avenue was tried in 1860 by several southern states. The result was the War for Southern Independence, which was won by those states who supported the Union. This victory established the Union as a power and as a central or national state dominant over the individual states, not by legal consent but by force of arms. The southern states were beaten into submission, and the subsequent legal political authority of the U.S.A., such as it is, rests on its military victory in 1865.
The rest of the story:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff191.html
The United States of America is a political union of fifty states and a federal district, commonly considered to be operating under the authority of the U.S. Constitution that was first adopted in 1787. The Union known as the U.S.A. was a creation of the then-existing thirteen states of the Union.
Lysander Spooner has provided ironclad arguments that this Constitution is an invalid authority for Americans of today. If that is so, and I believe it is, then no "legal" moves need to be taken to dissolve the U.S.A. It is already an entity that has no legal authority. In this case, the Union does not legally exist.
To demonstrate that fact and make it operative, however, requires that the Union be effectively shattered; and that requires the successful secession of any person or any political entity within the jurisdiction of the U.S.A. This avenue was tried in 1860 by several southern states. The result was the War for Southern Independence, which was won by those states who supported the Union. This victory established the Union as a power and as a central or national state dominant over the individual states, not by legal consent but by force of arms. The southern states were beaten into submission, and the subsequent legal political authority of the U.S.A., such as it is, rests on its military victory in 1865.
The rest of the story:
http://www.lewrockwell.com/rozeff/rozeff191.html
Monday, December 10, 2007
Anchorage Activist sets the record stright!
-Prussian Blue-Many of you have undoubtedly heard of the "Nazi Pop Twins" documentary on the Gaede Family, and, in particular, the white nationalist pop group known as Prussian Blue. This documentary was produced earlier this year and was aired in July 2007 by the United Kingdom's Channel Four. The Scotsman published a review of the documentary on July 14th.
You can see the rest of this on his blog at:
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
